On Wednesday 23 February 2005 11:49 am, Andrea Barisani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sick and tired of witnessing how difficult it is to reasonably > change a few headers in this mailing lists. While I acknolewdge the fact > that it's best to warn users before doing something like this I also > find unmanageable and useless any form of 'voting' for this kind of > issues. Stripping the Reply-To looked and still looks like a "sensible" > choice and easily manageable with a decent MUA and some basic > configrations skills. But apparently my presumptions of considering this > an "easy" change was mistaken and probably leaving the old setup is the > best choice since I have no time to discuss this and tell people how to > configure their MUA. I agree with you on all counts. While munging reply-to *is* broken, I think you did the right thing. Hopefully, we will be able to move to the correct use of reply-to at some point in the future. For all those that think munging the reply-to is correct, please read the document Andrea linked. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
