On Thursday 07 April 2011 14:04:05 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:49:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > > Bear in mind that LVM has been around for years. It is proven and
> > > reliable. Once setup, you don't have to touch it, so you can't break
> > > it. The least trustworthy part of your system remains the user.
> > 
> > Since I have no experience with LVM, that is the part I am worried
> > about.  If I knew everything you, Alan, Joost and others knew, I'd just
> > install everything on it and hope for the best.  I'm concerned that if
> > something did go wrong and I couldn't get help, I'd loose everything.
> > I don't have any way to back up this much data.  I hate webmail.  I
> > guess I could but that would just get on my nerves something bad.
> 
> In that case, set up a small physical volume and create a volume group
> that holds nothing important. Do you best to break it and only when you
> fail should you consider putting anything of any importance on there.

Eeerh... Neil....
I think Dale will probably succeed in breaking it :)

Dale, this comment isn't meant as an insult. I honestly think you would be 
perfect for some QA or Testing job :)

--
Joost

Reply via email to