Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:22:05 -0500, Dale wrote:
Wouldn't this be like putting package.* back to a file instead of a
directory tho? That would seem like one step forward and two steps
back. Maybe I am missing something again. I sort of got some "issues"
going on around here. :/
No, the discussion is about the name of the file in package.unmask. if
that is a file there is no issue. The problem is that portage just picks
a file from that directory, it should either have its own file in there or
add the entries to a file named after the package.
I agree but it doesn't do that. Of course, as I described, having many
files makes it difficult to find what file contains what too.
Dale
:-) :-)
