On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Joost Roeleveld <jo...@antarean.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 06:33:01 PM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer <grim...@gmx.de>
> wrote:
>> > If gentoo follows fedora on this mandatory initramfs trail, I'll switch
>> > to FreeBSD completely. My software works on way more systems than just
>> > "Linux".
>> That's of course your prerogative. And, as I said before: "Linux
>> strives to be much more than Unix, and that means do things
>> differently." If you want to do things the same way that it was done
>> in the last 20 years, maybe Linux is not the best of choices.
>
> I read it before, but to be much more then Unix, Linux should be doing things
> better. Being different is what led to MS Windows'

But that's the thing: we (you and me) don't see the situation the same
way. To me, the proposed changes are for the better.

>> I myself think the new technologies are worth to change the way we did
>> things before. But that's just me.
>
> The new technologies have great merit. But, the implementation of it isn't
> thought through.

In my humble opinion, what you just said is a little pedantic. You can
disagree with the proposed changes, you can argue why you think
another approach could be better. But just saying "the implementation
of it isn't  thought through", is a little insulting to the devs. I
think they though about the implementation a lot.

>> >> And maybe I shouldn't even mention it, but I don't use OpenRC. I use
>> >> systemd. And it works great on Gentoo.
>> >
>> > Well. Linux only. If I wanted a monoculture, I would use MS-Windows or
>> > OSX.
>> Relax man. I mention what I use: I'm not forcing you (or anybody else)
>> to use it. But I repeat (because I said it before) that I care about
>> Linux, and Linux only.
>
> If you care about Linux, why do you allow it to be broken in such a
> fundamental way?

Again, to me is not "breaking it". To me is "improving it".

Regards.
-- 
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Reply via email to