On Friday 14 Mar 2014 13:15:38 Guido Budack wrote: > Hello Mick, > > Yes, I know that, I am aware of it... > you don't deal here with some script-kid but with somebody who is observing > the IT-development of the past 25 years with highest attention... However, > the hashes of about 5 other files I downloaded (and as I said some bigger > ones too) are correct.
Right, but that could be incidental. Dodgy PSUs can appear to be random in their behaviour, or depend on the overall load of the machine. > What I not understand at all is that the file-size is absolutely correct- > that means to the last byte... OK, if the size is correct in kibibits (and not rounded up) then the discrepancy points to a miscalculation of the md5 hash. What does 'md5sum -c <file_name.md5>' return exactly? If you try 'md5sum <file_name>' more than once, but each time clear the memory cache first, do you get the same number? > Probably I'll not get any explanation by the community (or even worse > someone could 'attest me to try to attrack attention...') Just wanted to > let you know... I'm sure if you share more info some good Samaritan will drop by trying to help. :-) -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
