On Sat, 15 March 2014, at 11:16 am, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:06:22 Stroller wrote: >> On Wed, 12 March 2014, at 4:01 pm, Francesco Turco <ftu...@fastmail.fm> > wrote: >>>> is the published MD5-hash still valid? >>> >>> $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso >>> e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso >>> >>> Yes, the published MD5 hash is still valid. >> >> Since this thread seems to have taken on a life of its own, and because >> no-one else has done so, I just wanted to check in and say this is the >> md5sum I'm getting, too. >> >> I was careful to use the switch.ch URL that Guido gave in his first >> message. > > Ha! Could it be that the mirror has a corrupt iso, or is the DIGEST file > hashes wrong?! Well, that's why I used the same URL given by Guido - I get a different md5sum from him. Whichever mirror Francesco used, I get the same md5sum that he posted. Stroller.
