On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:06:22 Stroller wrote: > On Wed, 12 March 2014, at 4:01 pm, Francesco Turco <ftu...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > >> is the published MD5-hash still valid? > > > > $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso > > e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso > > > > Yes, the published MD5 hash is still valid. > > Since this thread seems to have taken on a life of its own, and because > no-one else has done so, I just wanted to check in and say this is the > md5sum I'm getting, too. > > I was careful to use the switch.ch URL that Guido gave in his first > message. > > Stroller.
Ha! Could it be that the mirror has a corrupt iso, or is the DIGEST file hashes wrong?! I'm on a metered ADSL connection here so I won't download the iso from different mirrors to compare, but someone else or the OP could do that, as has already been suggested in a previous post. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
