Mark David Dumlao <madumlao <at> gmail.com> writes:
perfomanced metrics; Choice; Unreasonable? > > work on publicly available data > > Ah, here is some of the tesing you are referring to?http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-March/017570.html > My position is that you're an idiot and a troll. > > The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit. If > you wanted to measure both, you could, literally, in the time it > took since you first posted in this thread till now you could > have measured several times and left mean comments about whichever > system you hated the most. This like compares kdbus to a test code ibench. It already done. Since you are so wise and I so, well limited, why don't you explain how the upcoming kdbus is giong to be faster? Speed in the kernel is important? > You're the only one in this thread that's imposing on everyone > to produce anything. You're the only one in this thread that > SHOULD be producing anything. That's how open source works and > that's how it's supposed to work. We're not your unpaid researchers. I'm sorry, Volker pointed out that the pro systemd folks came to gentoo-user, waiving linux's dirty panties around. We ask a few simple questions, now you result to name calling? Benchmarking lowlevel effects in the kernel is not new. Important changes are frequently marketed to the rest of the technical user community, by " gee guys look how fast kdbus is going to be" So, take your panties off, and show us just how fast you are? systemd + kdbus? Other *udev projects you would recommend? I accept your sceptre, but you must illuminate things a bit. <hugs and kisses?> James
