On 2024-05-28, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2024-05-21, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Here's my udev rules file that defines my network interface names
>>>> for the machine I'm on at the moment:
>>>>
>>>> ------------------/etc/udev/rules.d/70-my-persistent-net.rules-----------------------
>>>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTR{address}=="2c:f0:5d:6f:10:af",
>>>> NAME="net0"
>>>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTR{address}=="00:1b:21:b1:d1:e9",
>>>> NAME="net1"
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Got a little busy with my garden. Found my first zucchini yesterday.
> Ready to pick in a few days. Found some small tomatoes too. Anyway.
> Did manage to create this rule tho. This look reasonable? I'm thinking
> it should be named something else tho. It could clash with the usual
> name.
>
> # PCI device 0x11ab:0x4363 (Intel e1000e)
> #SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> ATTR{address}=="68:05:ca:42:17:39",ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1",
> KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="enp3s0"
Did my examples (with the MAC addresses and device names changed) not
work?
> I got the ATTR address from ifconfig. I'm not real sure on the other
> ATTR variables tho.
I don't use the other other ATTRs, ACTION, DRIVERS, or KERNEL and I
don't know why you added them, so I can't comment.
--
Grant
