Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2024-05-28, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Grant Edwards wrote: >>> On 2024-05-21, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> Here's my udev rules file that defines my network interface names >>>>> for the machine I'm on at the moment: >>>>> >>>>> ------------------/etc/udev/rules.d/70-my-persistent-net.rules----------------------- >>>>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTR{address}=="2c:f0:5d:6f:10:af", >>>>> NAME="net0" >>>>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTR{address}=="00:1b:21:b1:d1:e9", >>>>> NAME="net1" >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Got a little busy with my garden. Found my first zucchini yesterday. >> Ready to pick in a few days. Found some small tomatoes too. Anyway. >> Did manage to create this rule tho. This look reasonable? I'm thinking >> it should be named something else tho. It could clash with the usual >> name. >> >> # PCI device 0x11ab:0x4363 (Intel e1000e) >> #SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", >> ATTR{address}=="68:05:ca:42:17:39",ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", >> KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="enp3s0" > Did my examples (with the MAC addresses and device names changed) not > work? > >> I got the ATTR address from ifconfig. I'm not real sure on the other >> ATTR variables tho. > I don't use the other other ATTRs, ACTION, DRIVERS, or KERNEL and I > don't know why you added them, so I can't comment. > > -- > Grant
Well, I found one with google and sort of went by that. Now that I read yours again, yours makes more sense, from what little I know. o_O Is ATTR address the same as Mac address? If so, why not have the same names for all tools???? How's this look? SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTR{address}=="68:05:ca:42:17:39", NAME="dale0" I gave it a different name this time. I'm assuming I'd need to reboot to test this or is restarting udev enough?? Dang it's humid outside. I feel like I need diving gear out there so I can breathe. O_O Dale :-) :-)