Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2024-05-28, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> On 2024-05-21, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Here's my udev rules file that defines my network interface names
>>>>> for the machine I'm on at the moment:
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------/etc/udev/rules.d/70-my-persistent-net.rules-----------------------
>>>>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTR{address}=="2c:f0:5d:6f:10:af",
>>>>> NAME="net0"
>>>>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTR{address}=="00:1b:21:b1:d1:e9",
>>>>> NAME="net1"
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Got a little busy with my garden. Found my first zucchini yesterday.
>> Ready to pick in a few days. Found some small tomatoes too. Anyway.
>> Did manage to create this rule tho. This look reasonable? I'm thinking
>> it should be named something else tho. It could clash with the usual
>> name.
>>
>> # PCI device 0x11ab:0x4363 (Intel e1000e)
>> #SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
>> ATTR{address}=="68:05:ca:42:17:39",ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1",
>> KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="enp3s0"
> Did my examples (with the MAC addresses and device names changed) not
> work?
>
>> I got the ATTR address from ifconfig. I'm not real sure on the other
>> ATTR variables tho.
> I don't use the other other ATTRs, ACTION, DRIVERS, or KERNEL and I
> don't know why you added them, so I can't comment.
>
> --
> Grant
Well, I found one with google and sort of went by that. Now that I read
yours again, yours makes more sense, from what little I know. o_O
Is ATTR address the same as Mac address? If so, why not have the same
names for all tools???? How's this look?
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTR{address}=="68:05:ca:42:17:39",
NAME="dale0"
I gave it a different name this time. I'm assuming I'd need to reboot to test
this or is restarting udev enough??
Dang it's humid outside. I feel like I need diving gear out there so I can
breathe. O_O
Dale
:-) :-)
