Willie Wong wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:16:05PM -0600, Penguin Lover Dale squawked: >> This is my two cents. Since when someone comes here and posts a html >> message they get told not to use html anyway, why not let them know >> beforehand that html is not the "norm" on this list? I don't think it >> would hurt to put that on the website where the mailing lists subscribe >> info is and also in the email that confirms the subscription. I >> wouldn't mind seeing that part in bold or something in the email to make >> sure it is seen. I suspect this would solve a lot of problems in the >> long run. > > Uh... so how will you put something in "bold" in an e-mail without > HTML? And if you do use HTML, is it not hypocritical to tell the > users, in bold nontheless, that they should not? > > ;p > > W Some mail readers convert *asterisks* as bold statements. I believe it is the generally accepted way to make a section stand out when dealing with plain text.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature