On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:57 PM, David Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > I have attached a PDF with the results of testing the performance of > compressed WFS (ie. using a zipped HTTP layer to carry WFS).
Very nice. The first result is quite a bit odd though... how is is that retrieving only 680 points is slower than retrieving 5000 and has the same performance as retrieving 32000? 30 seconds for only that amount of points seems really too much. Was the internet connection capped with something else during that test? Cheers Andrea -- Ing. Andrea Aime Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584962313 fax: +39 0584962313 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
