On 03/16/2013 03:00 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jonathan Moules < > jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk> wrote: > >> Hi List, >> So, simple question: Should we stick with the default Jetty or go with >> Tomcat instead, and more importantly - why? We're going to be using it on a >> Windows Server 2008 R2. >> What do other folks use? As Jetty already-works for us, is there a reason >> to justify spending the time swapping to a unfamiliar package? >> >> I'm surprised this hasn't been asked more often - a search of the archives >> only found it once and the answer was simply "use tomcat" with no >> explanation of why. >> > > The installation package uses Jetty for convenience, it's small and > provides just the functionality needed for people to > quickly try out GeoServer. > > At the same time, the Jetty we embed is 6.1.8, which is 4 years old, as > such it has received no performance or > security upgrades since back then. >
That seems kinda silly, is it non-trivial to ship a newer version? Seems like 6.1.x series is still common (6.1.24 on ubuntu 12.04), which I would guess is just fixes. Thanks, Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
