johann sorel wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry to stop this proposal but I'm actualy working onmultiple portrayal > specification i'm willing to add in GeoAPI/GeoTools > > Actually GeoTools is based on SLD style system v:1.0.0 , before making a > proposal to move away from the OGC SLD specification I suggest we implement > SLD v:1.1.0 . > SLD 1.10 has been splitted in SLD 1.1 and SE 1.1 (SE = Symbology Encoding) > Eclesia I have reviewed SE 1.1 (exactly to see if had any help for us on this issue). While it does a lot of things I am very excited about (including separating out all that WMS specific SLD stuff into a different schema), it does not help address this particular problem.
The by the book solution for MIL2525B and emergency response symbols is to set up a series of Rules that map from attribute tests to PointSymbolizers with fixed marks. Now while you can change many things dynamically based on attributes; selecting a mark is not one of them.... and that is what this proposal is trying to fix. The proposal has value all on its own since it allows us to optimize a case that is traditionally troublesome; ie working with any of these SLD documents offline is a good way to make uDig useless (as we have to wait for each external graphic reference to timeout). SE 1.1 does offer a form of what we need; and notices that internal graphics exist; it just does not open the door wide enough to let us specify which one to select based on an Expression. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
