On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
<ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>> Changing the Query API will affect every DataStore. If this is done by
>>> expanding Query and DefaultQuery as you indicated, it should be possible to
>>> leave the existing DataStore implementations untouched.
>>>
>> Can we modify the Query interface in a way we don;t have to modify all
>> datastores? What I mean is is keep String[] getPropertyNames() in tact, but
>> add a Name[] getProperties() or something. Internally we can store the
>> qualified names.
>>
>
> Yes, exactly. Jody suggested extending the API with a List, but I was
> thinking:
> Collection<Name> getProperties()
I think we still need a List in order to allow people to specify the order
of the resulting properties?
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
