On 1/03/2011 18:04, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Jan De Moerloose
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Andrea,
big thanks for the explanation, i think it's clear enough for me now.
In principle it means that we can't guarantee binary compatibility
on going from y to y+1.
Well no, even going from x.y to x.y+1 there is no binary compatibility
guarantee, that you get
only when going from x.y.z to x.y.z+1
Exactly, x.y to x.y+1 is what i meant. Am i correct that the versioning
page
(http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/conventions/version.html)
seems to suggest otherwise ?
Minor (second digit) is incremented whenever new features are added.
Modules are*forward compatible* across minor versions, but usually not
backward compatible.
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
--
Sincerely,
Jan De Moerloose
Geosparc n.v.
http://www.geosparc.com
sponsor of http://www.geomajas.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
