Hi folks Can I ask for some help with http://schema.org/GeoShape ?
I'm working on http://schema.org/, and it's come to my attention that we have some half-baked geo stuff in there which I'd like to get fixed. See #geo logs below. Basically there are a bunch of structures derived from fairly similar stuff from IPTC's rNews 1.0, which itself seems based on GeoRSS. I'd like to fix up our docs to have plausible examples, as well link appropriately to GeoRSS and other related specs. There are more details in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2012Jun/0116.html Thanks for any advice, Dan 14:36 danbri: ahem, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10297279/what-are-the-appropriate-formats-for-the-properties-of-http-schema-org-geoshap/10466686 14:36 danbri: seems like we've some geo- cleanup to do in http://schema.org/GeoShape ... advice welcomed 14:36 danbri: details http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2012Jun/0116.html 14:46 danbri: apparently schema.org geo is based on rNews is based on geoRss 14:47 danbri: and I'm told ... 14:47 danbri: 'In the GeoRSS spec, you'll see that the first and last actually are the same, 45.256 -110.45, <georss:polygon> 45.256 -110.45 46.46 -109.48 43.84 -109.86 45.256 -110.45 ' 14:47 danbri: in the rNews examples we don't have the repetition; I took it to be implicit and redundant. Thoughts? 14:49 danbri looks at http://www.georss.org/simple#Polygon 14:50 danbri: "A polygon contains a space separated list of latitude-longitude pairs, with each pair separated by whitespace. There must be at least four pairs, with the last being identical to the first (so a polygon has a minimum of three actual points)." 14:50 danbri: is the final one acting like a check? _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list Geowanking@geowanking.org http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
