Once more: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Christian Johansen <christ...@cjohansen.no> wrote: > As I've already said many times, we will not deprecate a working solution in > favor of a less capable one, so this shouldn't be a concern. Apart from > that, I don't really get the sceptic attitude against HTTPS push? Why is it > important that only SSH is used for pushing? (Given that the usability issue > can be solved).
I start to fear that the audience (me included) is chosen 'wrong' and heavily biased. You're asking people that either are interested in the development of gitorious already or have 1-N private instances up and running. You want to make a change to reach the people that are _not_ subscribed here, I guess. The people on this list probably care less for 'alternative things for something that already works now, albeit in a different way'. So - although I still think that ssh should stay and that GUI client support is a valid point: I cannot ignore the thought that I might be just a lazy bum that wants to keep it as it is, for the sake of it. -- To post to this group, send email to gitorious@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gitorious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
