On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:42 PM, <jarrod.rober...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, lots of people disable the HTTP support completely and only use SSH > for writes and Git of read only access. This is what we do for our > installation. > This is very important for work flows where people should be able to check > out read only copies but not be able to write. >
I'd argue that requiring different URLs for reading and writing is more cumbersome than using the same one and then using authentication/authorization to handle requests to write to the repository. > There is already what looks like a nice Chef recipe for Ubuntu, we don't do > Ubuntu because we have standardized on RHEL5/CentOS5 because that is what > all our clients use, an RPM package and a custom YUM repository for > RHEL5/CentOS5.x that at least consolidated all the very specific > Ruby/Rails/Passenger details into a single RPM and have dependencies on all > the other stuff like Apache, MySQL, etc. would go a long way to a more > painless adoption. It would be wonderful if someone would step up and take responsibility for .rpm/.deb packages of Gitorious, nothing would be better. Last time I checked there weren't packages for some of the dependencies (activemq, sphinx), they'd need to be maintained as well. As for Passenger, it seems Fedora/RedHat won't include that for some time: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Cheers, - Marius -- To post to this group, send email to gitorious@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gitorious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
