Paul Iadonisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The big thing the frames support. I expect that when links has ssl support > that lynx will go a way. I don't think Red Hat has a problem with lynx, but > the frames support is probably what prompted it to migrate to links.
There's also table support: links handles tables reasonably well, and lynx doesn't. For simple tables, links is great; but for sites that use multiple nested tables as formatting, they can be completely unreadable in links while they're perfectly readable in lynx. I'd hate to see lynx disappear, if only for this reason. -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix ICQ 28611923 / AIM abreauj / JABBER [EMAIL PROTECTED] / YAHOO abreauj Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0xD5C7B5D9 PGP-Key-Fingerprint 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99
msg12908/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
