Why coordinator delays posting Mohammad's translations?


On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Christian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 6/26/08, Mohammad Foroughi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mr. Hesabi:
> >
> >   Roozbeh Pournader has made a significant contribution to persian
> >  translation, farsi fonts, and fribidi and many other projects.
>
> Yes.
>
>
> >   He was active till 2006, but I do not know why he become inactive
> >  during 2006-2008:
> >
> >  http://tinyurl.com/4o2p5x
>
> Well, a Google search for mailing list traffic has little evidence
> value. A person can be a good contributor and commit lots of stuff to
> SVN and be active on other forums, without it ever showing up as
> activity on another given mailing list.
>
>
> >  He just become re-active by my emails to the list.
> >
> >  But it seems that he is very monopolist, and do not let others to join
> >  his team. He think that gnome is his father's inheritance, and he and
> >  his guys are representation of All Iranians In The World!!!
>
> So far all communication I have seen from Roozbeh and Behdad and
> others has been positive in regards of wanting to accept new
> volunteers. From what I can see, there's nothing stopping you or
> others from joining the existing Persian team.
>
>
> >  I wanna know how many hands he have?
> >
> >  Can a person manage all these:
> >
> >  Developer on FriBiDi
> >       * Contributor on Fedora Project
> >       * Contributor on Pango
> >       * Contributor on GNOME i18n Project
> >       * Contributor on Translation Project
> >       * Contributor on GNOME
> >       * Contributor on GTK+
> >       * Contributor on Mozilla
> >       * Contributor on Evolution
> >       * Contributor on FarsiTeX
> >       * Lead Developer on Sharif Linux
> >
> >  http://www.advogato.org/person/roozbeh/
>
> A static Advogato page says little to nothing about a person's current
> activities. One can be a frequent contributor to one project one year,
> and spend one's contributions on another project the next year. An
> Advogato page tells you nothing of the sort, apart from possibly some
> selected historic contributions.
>
>
> >  This causes that all things are blocked and in domination of a single
> >  group.
> >
> >  It is better to take coordination from him and give it to an
> >  organization in iran, and that organization decide he DESERVES
> >  coordination?
>
> Coordinatorship is given to *individuals*, never to companies nor
> other organisations. You can be an employee of any company or a member
> of any organisation you like, but your contributions and duties will
> always reflect on you as an individual. If person X is a coordinator
> and at the same time an employee for company Y, it is still X who is a
> coordinator. Company Y has, for all purposes, nothing to do with it,
> other than perhaps paying the salary for X. If X decides to leave
> company Y and instead join organization Z, or no organization at all,
> we wouldn't care less. It is still X who is coordinator.
>
>
> >  Roozbeh says that I do not deserve attention,
> >
> >  I SAY that HE DO NOT DESERVE COORDINATION?
> >
> >  Witch one is true?
> >
> >  How you can decide?
> >
> >  Can gnome boys that are not Native persian Speakers decide?
> >
> >  No, iranians should deciude?
>
> Yes, we can decide. GNOME is no different than most other free
> software projects. Almost everything is based on trust, respect and
> merits (contributions).
> If a person has been a long time contributor and active in the
> community for a long time, he naturally has earned some respect and
> trust. If he has been contributing a lot, the contributions tell that
> this person is contributing for real and not just producing words.
>
> If another new person starts showing up, and instead of showing merits
> (contributions) just produce flames, rants, insults, personal attacks
> and accusations and generally behaving rude on a mailing list, we
> would have the other end of the scale -- a person that cannot be
> trusted and is worthy of no respect.
>
> That being said, of course persons that speak Persian are in general
> in a *much* better position to judge on translation quality and the
> quality of contributions. That's why we defer to the teams to review
> the translations. But when it comes to judging the amount of
> contributions and people's general attitude, and who do we trust more,
> we certainly can decide for ourselves.
>
>
> >  I propose, you (gnome founders and admins) make an email to an Iranian
> >  institute that is responsible for translation (or similar things) and
> >  aks them: "If roozbeh is a competent person?" Or make a connection to
> >  sharif university and ask them about roozbeh.
> >
> >  I strongly insist that roozbeh and his team must change and the new team
> >  coordination should be given to an institute instead of a single person.
>
> As I said, coordinatorship is never given to an organization, it is
> given to an individual. That's how our community works.
>
>
> >  this way, an arrogant person can not play with a nation's benefits.
>
> Calling a person "arrogant" is not exactly the way to move forward.
>
>
> Christian
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Reply via email to