Kenneth Nielsen wrote: > On another note, seeing the size of this change makes me wonder. It must > have taken an immence development effort to complete this update, > streching over quite some time, would it really have been so difficult > to warn us back when you began and then to commit every once in a while > so we could have had more time with some of the strings?
I thought it was going to be committed sooner, relative to the freezes, but then the freezes ended up being a lot sooner than I had been thinking. As for committing every once in a while, that wouldn't have helped; the earlier stages diverged from 2.22 even more. Most of the work involved was getting the new Locations.xml.in to be *more* like the old Locations.xml.in, except in the places where the old Locations.xml.in sucked. > We need to come to some agreement on this soon Sorry, I'd been under the impression that we already *had* come to an agreement (after no one responded to my last message). Most of the translators have not participated in this thread, so I don't have a sense if this is "a few translators want the changes reverted" or "most of the translators want the changes reverted". I guess if it's the latter then maybe that's a different story. -- Dan _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n