Here, I mean the free and open the same way I mentioned. Why the split, FSF and OSI? OSI is free, but why FSF is not open? :(
Open source software is not free at all in many cases. For example, the Microsoft Shared Source License is a non-free license, but it is a Open source license. It is a non-free license since it disallows commercial distribution. There are more such examples, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html for a list of licenses which are free and which are not. Cheers. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
