Hey dak, call 911 for comrade ams. "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > > > > Which has nothing to do with why the NASA Open Source Agreement > > > (NOSG) is a non-free license. I suggest you read section G: > > > > > > | G. Each Contributor represents that that its Modification is > > > | believed to be Contributor's original creation and does not > > > | violate any existing agreements, regulations, statutes or > > > | rules, and further that Contributor has sufficient rights to > > > | grant the rights conveyed by this Agreement. > > > > > > I.e. I am not allowed to take code that I have not created and > > > combine it with a program which is licensed under the NOSG. > > > > When you take third party code and combine that code with NOSA'd > > code, it is neither modification nor Modification, [...] > > > > The end product is a modification, yes. > ... > > The creation that is added > > Is just separate computer program (literary) work (aka software). > > A seperate program which is not the "Contributor's original creation".
It's separate software from the Subject Software. > > Program code A + program code B modifies neither program code A nor > program code B. > > But program A or B is not the "Contributor's original creation". And? > > E. "Larger Work" means computer software that combines Subject > Software, or portions thereof, with software separate from the > Subject Software that is not governed by the terms of this > Agreement. > > Again, nothing to do with this. > > For example, you cannot take someone elses NOSA licensed work, and add > it to a NOSA licensed work, Man oh man, why don't you call NASA and check it with them? (202) 358-0001 If not dak, then they will call 911 for you, I hope. > since it is not the "Contributors original creation". Uh moron. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
