> Which has nothing to do with why the NASA Open Source Agreement > (NOSG) is a non-free license. I suggest you read section G: > > | G. Each Contributor represents that that its Modification is > | believed to be Contributor's original creation and does not > | violate any existing agreements, regulations, statutes or > | rules, and further that Contributor has sufficient rights to > | grant the rights conveyed by this Agreement. > > I.e. I am not allowed to take code that I have not created and > combine it with a program which is licensed under the NOSG.
When you take third party code and combine that code with NOSA'd code, it is neither modification nor Modification, [...] The end product is a modification, yes. The creation that is added to create the modification is not the `Contributor's original creation' though. Read all about "Larger Work" as spelled in both DEFINITIONS and OBLIGATIONS OF RECIPIENT sections in Which has nothing to do with this, since it isn't a `Larger work' that is being used. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss