"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > > If it makes you happy, then the NASA Open Source Agreement is listed > http://opensource.org/licenses/, but it is not a free software > license. > > NASA Open Source Agreement > > The NASA Open Source Agreement, version 1.3, is not a free > software license because it includes a provision requiring > changes to be your "original creation". Free software > development depends on combining code from third parties, and > the NASA license doesn't permit this.
And that is just yet another proof that RMS and you are utter retards. See "Larger Work" in http://opensource.org/licenses/nasa1.3.php idiot. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
