On Thu, 14 May 1998, Derek Wyatt wrote:
>
> > I would suggest that LilyX not be a separate stand-alone project.
> > Borrow from Lilypond: the Mudela I/O is probably applicable, if you
> > internally use the same classes as Lilypond. Midi keyboard input can
> > start as mi2mu.
>
> I certainly agree with everything you said except this point. i honestly
> tried to find a way to make LilyX an integrated project with Lily but
> quite frankly these guys just work too damned hard on it. It changes too
> fast. I would spend 60% of the time integrating the X part into the brain
> with each new release. The best i can do is stick as close as possible to
> Lily and hopefully do a huge integration down the road -- assuming that
> becomes a good idea.
>
It's probably a good idea to start with a version of Lilypond that works
well for you, and don't upgrade that installation very often while you're in
the middle of your work.
Is the team using CVS? I don't remember if that was mentioned. I
personally use CVS at home and at work for all developments. I can
put all kinds of personalized bells and whistles on a program, and still
upgrade it when the new version comes out.
--
Dave | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brown | Packet: N2RJT@WB2PSI.#WNY.NY.USA.NOAM
