> I think this is a very good idea actually - I'd go as far to say it would > be simplest if we restrict submissions to Mutopia to one of three licenses: > > 1) Public Domain (already being used - must be used if music is entirely > out of copyright) > 2) A BSD Style license which we write and put on the website > 3) A copyleft license (still to be decided) > > This makes it easier for submitters (they don't have to make up their own > BSD Style license if they want to use one) and people downloading the music > (they can see clearly from the table of music exactly which license is > being used). Does this make sense? I kind of agree that it's practical to have a few standard formulations. However, there are cases where it might be necessary to add some extra lines. One example is a score I typeset where the library owning the manuscript requested that they would be acknowledged in the edition. /Mats
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Werner Icking
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Peter Chubb
- Re: Mutopia License: Choral Public Domai... David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: Choral Public D... David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Werner Icking
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Chris Sawer
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Mats Bengtsson
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Chris Sawer
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Raleigh Arnold
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Michael Ossmann
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Alain CULOS
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style licen... Alain CULOS
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license David Chan
- Re: Mutopia License: BSD-style license Romain d'Alverny