Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here is what I think we should do. > > 1) Drop the Motif/Qt code. > 2) Drop the SWIG/Perl code. > 3) Reimplement the build system. If 1 and/or 2 will happen, I'd love for it to happen before I finish 3. :-) Linas gave some good reasons for keeping perl though. -- matt - http://www.lickey.com ----- %< -------------------------------------------- >% ------ The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing List To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put "unsubscribe gnucash-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the body
- Scheme as the scripting language (was Re:.... Alexandru Harsanyi
- Re: Scheme as the scripting language (... Jesse D. Sightler
- Re: Scheme as the scripting langu... Rob Browning
- Re: Scheme as the scripting l... Jesse D. Sightler
- Re: Scheme as the scripting l... Alexandru Harsanyi
- Re: Scheme as the scripting l... linas
- Re: Scheme as the scripting l... Matt Armstrong
- Re: Scheme as the scripting l... Jesse D. Sightler
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin linas
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin Jeremy Collins
- Re: Simpler financial package: gn... Matt Armstrong
- Re: Simpler financial package: gn... Rob Browning
- Re: Simpler financial package... Jesse D. Sightler
- Re: Simpler financial package... Rob Browning
- Re: Simpler financial package... Matt Armstrong
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin Alan Orndorff
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin Todd Greer
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin Jeremy Collins
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin Alexandru Harsanyi
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin Rob Browning
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin linas