On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:47, look@my.amazin.horse said: > Huh, that's interesting. I was not aware of this issue, and wish you had > reached > out to me, or to supp...@keys.openpgp.org, or filed an issue on Hagrid.
I assumed that newly launched server software with the goal to take over all existing keyservers has been properly tested on the major desktop platform. We track the case as https://dev.gnupg.org/T4597 > This BSI requirement was not known to me. While it would be preferable > to stick It is not a requirement but it is what has been evaluated. Changing anything crypto related requires discussion on whether this will affect the approval. It won't be a problem for GnuPG 2.3 because a lot of things will change there anyway and a re-evaluation will be required. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
