There's also the considerable risk that the journal will not be sustainable 
under such a model.  Once the volunteers lose interest, retire, or whatever, 
others may not be willing to take on the work and the institution behind it may 
no longer want to support it.

As Sally said, there are real costs to such enterprises, they are just well 
masked within the infrastructure and staffing budgets for the sponsoring 
organizations.

Mary Summerfield

Publications Business Development Manager
SPIE
+1 360 685 5588 (Office)
+1 360 647 1445 (Fax)
mar...@spie.org<mailto:mar...@spie.org>

SPIE is the international society for optics and photonics.
SPIE.org<http://www.spie.org/>

Learn about SPIE Press Books<http://spie.org/x31646.xml> and SPIE 
Journals<https://spie.org/documents/publications/journals/journal-brochure-10-11-L.pdf>.

SPIE CONFIDENTIAL

From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of 
Sally Morris
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 8:00 AM
To: 'Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)'
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Planning for the Open Access Era

Do you think that doesn't entail cost?

The people who are doing this work 'free' (and the computer services provided 
'free', etc) are all in reality being paid by someone to do their 'real' jobs.  
And, presumably, the amount of time devoted to those 'real' jobs is accordingly 
reduced.

Sally


Sally Morris
South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex, UK  BN13 3UU
Tel:  +44 (0)1903 871286
Email:  sa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk<mailto:sa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>


________________________________
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org<mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org> 
[mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org]<mailto:[mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org]> On 
Behalf Of Peter Murray-Rust
Sent: 07 August 2012 15:12
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Planning for the Open Access Era

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Sally Morris 
<sa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk<mailto:sa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>> wrote:
We should not delude ourselves; journals can only be 'free' if someone pays
the costs.

All the work involved in creating and running a journal has to be paid for
somehow - they don't magically go away if a journal is e-only (in fact,
there are some new costs, even though some of the old ones disappear).

I can only see three options for who pays:  reader-side (e.g. the library);
author-side (e.g. publication fees);  or 'fairy godmother' (e.g. sponsor).

There is a fourth option, which works: the scholarly community manage 
publication through contributed labour and resources and the net amount of cash 
is near-zero. This is described in 
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2012/03/06/an-efficient-journal/ where 
the J. Machine Learning Research is among the highest regarded journals in the 
area (top 7%) and free-to-authors and free-to-readers. There is an enlightening 
debate (on this URL) between those who run the journal and Kent Anderson of the 
Scholarly Kitchen who cannot believe that people will run and work for journals 
for the good of the community.

There is no law of physics that says this doesn't scale. It is simply that most 
scholars would rather the taxpayer and students paid for the administration 
publishing (either as author-side or reader-side) so the scholars don't have to 
do the work. And they've managed ot get 10 B USD per year. If scholars regarded 
publishing as part of their role, of if they were prepared to involved the 
wider community (as Wikipedia has done) we could have a much more C21 type of 
activity - innovative and valuable to the whole world rather than just 
academia. It would cost zero, but it would be much cheaper than any current 
model.

And of course we now have a complete free map of the whole world 
(openstreetmap.org<http://openstreetmap.org>) which is so much better than 
other alternatives that many people and organizations are switching to it. And, 
for many years, it didn't have a bank account and existed on "marginal 
resources" from UCL (and probably still does).

But most people will regard this as another fairy tale.


--
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to