Dear Gemma

The OA2020 proposes a separate business model involving a “large scale 
transition to open access”. What is the position of Elsevier relative to that 
initiative? The position of the Max Planck is there is enough money in the 
system to enable the transition to an open access model so it is largely a 
matter of shifting that money around. Do you share the same views? What are the 
challenges and enablers you view in the OA2020 proposal? I think this 
initiative deserves attention as it would allow us to set aside that mounting 
“arm race” between users who want unhampered access and publishers who need 
revenues.

Cordially

Éric

Eric Archambault, PhD
CEO  |  Chef de la direction
1335, Mont-Royal E
Montréal QC Canada  H2J 1Y6

T. 1.514.495.6505 x.111
C. 1.514.518.0823
eric.archamba...@science-metrix.com<mailto:eric.archamba...@science-metrix.com>
science-metrix.com<http://www.science-metrix.com/>  &  
1science.com<http://www.science-metrix.com/>

[cid:image002.jpg@01D2E993.3D1730C0]      [cid:image004.png@01D2E993.3D1730C0]



From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of 
Hersh, Gemma (ELS-CAM)
Sent: June 19, 2017 11:18 PM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) <goal@eprints.org>
Subject: Re: [GOAL] Elsevier's interpretation of CC BY-NC-ND

Dear Richard

Elsevier's hosting 
policy<https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/hosting> explains 
how platforms can host Elsevier content. This includes enabling institutional 
repositories to share their employee's or student's accepted manuscripts 
publicly after an embargo period, but not beforehand.

The challenge with the proposal below is that it wouldn’t really work very well 
for very long; an embargo period is needed to enable the subscription model to 
continue to operate, in the absence of a separate business model.

Best wishes

Gemma

Gemma Hersh
VP, Policy and Communications
Elsevier I 125 London Wall I London I EC2Y 5AS
M: +44 (0) 7855 258 957 I E: g.he...@elsevier.com<mailto:g.he...@elsevier.com>
Twitter: @gemmahersh




From: goal-boun...@eprints.org<mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org> 
[mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of Richard Poynder
Sent: 18 June 2017 14:30
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) 
<goal@eprints.org<mailto:goal@eprints.org>>
Subject: Re: [GOAL] Elsevier's interpretation of CC BY-NC-ND


*** External email: use caution ***


On a related topic, this poster might be of interest to list members:

Exploiting Elsevier’s Creative Commons License Requirement to Subvert Embargo

"In the last round of author sharing policy revisions, Elsevier created a 
labyrinthine title-by-title embargo structure requiring embargoes from 12-48 
months for author sharing via institutional repository (IR), while permitting 
immediate sharing via author's personal website or blog. At the same time, all 
pre-publication versions are to bear a Creative 
Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND) license.

"At the time this policy was announced, it was rightly criticized by many in 
the scholarly communication community as overly complicated and unnecessary. 
However, this CC licensing requirement creates an avenue for subverting the 
embargo in the IR to achieve quicker open distribution of the author's accepted 
manuscript.

"In short, authors may post an appropriately licensed copy on their personal 
site, at which point we may deposit without embargo in the IR, not through the 
license granted in the publication agreement, but through the CC license on the 
author's version, which the sharing policy mandates. This poster will outline 
this issue, our experimentation with application, and engage viewers in 
questions regarding its potential risks, benefits, and workflows."

https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/handle/1808/24107

​


On 18 June 2017 at 12:24, Mittermaier, Bernhard 
<b.mitterma...@fz-juelich.de<mailto:b.mitterma...@fz-juelich.de>> wrote:
Dear colleagues,

on sharing in file-sharing networks, Creatice Commons explain:

“Can I share CC-licensed material on file-sharing networks?
Yes. All CC licenses allow redistribution of the unmodified material by any 
means, including distribution via file-sharing networks. Note that file-trading 
is expressly considered to be noncommercial for purposes of compliance with the 
NC licenses. Barter of NC-licensed material for other items of value is not 
permitted.”
https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-share-cc-licensed-material-on-file-sharing-networks

The “Elsevier Sharing Rules” say
“CC-BY-NC-ND licensed articles may be shared on non-commercial platforms only.”
http://help.sciencedirect.com/flare/sdhelp_Left.htm#CSHID=password.htm|StartTopic=Content%2Fsharing_pubs.htm|SkinName=svs_SD<http://help.sciencedirect.com/flare/sdhelp_Left.htm#CSHID=password.htm%7CStartTopic=Content%2Fsharing_pubs.htm%7CSkinName=svs_SD>

and again in the table at the bottom of that webpage: “Public posting on 
commercial platforms (e.g., www.researchgate.net<http://www.researchgate.net>, 
www.academia.edu<http://www.academia.edu>)” :not allowed

I’ve been asking Alicia Wise, on what grounds why Elsevier takes that position. 
She replied:
„Both ResearchGate & academia.edu<http://academia.edu> use content commercially 
to sell advertising & services around the content they disseminate” and “Both 
ResearchGate & academia.edu<https://t.co/IQgdiiCF1s> are problems in Germany as 
they go beyond private use to make NC content publicly available” 
(https://twitter.com/wisealic/status/874284792275140609 and 
https://twitter.com/wisealic/status/874284916644696066 )

My interpretation of the CC licence is that sharing of CC BY-NC-ND article by 
commercial platforms is OK as long as they don’t sell the articles (which they 
don’t do).
But apart from that - what authors are doing is IMHO definitely not prohibited 
because they have no commercial gain whatsoever.

What do you think?

Kind regards
Bernhard
###########################################

Dr. Bernhard Mittermaier
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
Leiter der Zentralbibliothek / Head of the Central Library
52425 Jülich
Tel  ++49-2461-613013<tel:+49%202461%20613013>
Fax ++49-2461-616103<tel:+49%202461%20616103>

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender),
Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt


_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org<mailto:GOAL@eprints.org>
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal



--
Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk<http://www.richardpoynder.co.uk>

________________________________

Elsevier Limited. Registered Office: The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, 
Oxford, OX5 1GB, United Kingdom, Registration No. 1982084, Registered in 
England and Wales.
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to