"Ok, sorry about that. But one thing to remember is that SQL is much more ..." hi, Anders, again, this thread is to compare computing prices, not data storage. You will pay extra data storage money when using gae.
I just want to get a reason from googlers why gae computing cost 10 times than competitors. Anders wrote: > Ok, sorry about that. But one thing to remember is that SQL is much more > powerful than the GAE datastore when it comes to functionality which would > demand a lower price for GAE. On the other hand the GAE datastore is > designed for scaling, which may be difficult to achieve using ordinary > relational databases like MySQL. I like the GAE datastore because it scales > automatically. It's just having to pay for frontend instances I think really > sucks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
