The last three days the GAE instance scheduler works accurate again. There are just 1 or 2 loading-requests the day. Remember: The weeks before I head hundreds of loading-request and many DeadlineExceededException.
But no status-update from Google on http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8004 ? What has happened? - Just luck ? - Did some GAE infrastructure / policy changed on 1th September ? - Did somebody fix the weird instance scheduler? Perhaps after his or her summer holiday ? - Or did praying help ? Please Google, be transparent on this issue. I had a downtime of 5h 19m in August (99,29%) in August. Other people had similar experiences. We need to know if reliability of GAE is fixed durably! Thanks Mos On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Mos <mosa...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Today again hundreds of useless instance restarts and many > DeadlineExceededException. > (Tried many configuration issues. Nothing helps. My last try : > max-idle-instance to one) > > Any news on http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8004? > > As Kris wrote below the problem exists now for one month! > > GOOGLE, PLEASE FIX THE CRITICAL PRODUCTION PROBLEM .. we are loosing > every day money and customer as long as GAE/Java works like junk !! > > I deeply regret to trust Google/GAE and build our application for this > PaaS. > > Mos > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Kristopher Giesing < > kris.gies...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I posted a great deal of information in the thread here: >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/google-appengine/rjZhjMEAXUI >> >> In that thread I posted logs that showed that the very first request >> after setting min instances to 1 will spawn a new instance (in addition to >> the instance that the min instances setting created). The app ID used in >> that testing is "titan-game-qa" and the timestamps are in the logs I posted. >> >> At some point I will have enough bandwidth to set up a more specific >> test, but I feel I've already posted plenty of information for GAE >> engineers to digest. >> >> - Kris >> >> On Monday, August 27, 2012 2:17:47 AM UTC-7, Johan Euphrosine (Google) >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Kristopher Giesing >>> <kris.g...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> Resident instances are used for processing incoming request if there >>> >> is no dynamic instance >>> > >>> > >>> > This is the behavior we all want, but experimentation seems to >>> indicate it >>> > doesn't happen, at least for some apps. >>> >>> Hi Kristopher, >>> >>> Can you comment with the appid and timestamps of when this last >>> happened? >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> > >>> > - Kris >>> > >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> > "Google App Engine" group. >>> > To view this discussion on the web visit >>> > https://groups.google.com/d/**msg/google-appengine/-/_**wh1KzpESLEJ<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/_wh1KzpESLEJ>. >>> >>> > >>> > To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.**com. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > google-appengi...@**googlegroups.com. >>> > For more options, visit this group at >>> > http://groups.google.com/**group/google-appengine?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en>. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Johan Euphrosine (proppy) >>> Developer Programs Engineer >>> Google Developer Relations >>> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
