On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, John Tamplin <j...@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Bruce Johnson <br...@google.com> wrote: > >> (BTW, I could be wrong about the whole "let's not have freeform text". It >> was just one guy's opinion that it makes things too inconsistent. I'd like >> to hear if other people agree/disagree.) >> >> @Other people: agree/disagree? >> > > I think there may be some case where you want/need more explanation, > especially if it is of the form "If you were doing X, use module A -- if you > were doing Y, use module B". However, I think the URL will address most of > that and it is easy enough to extend it later for free-form text if it > becomes useful to do so -- it is harder to remove it if we add it now but it > isn't useful. > > The one question I have is where will the URL point for an unreleased > version? Ie, say we deprecate something in trunk, where would we make the > URL point for more information? > The compiler does this already by including reference to HTML files that are included in the distro. It is important that this could work (i.e. file URLs). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
