Hi everyone,

Week 4 has concluded, and this is my report for this week.


1) What did I get done this week?

r.mfilter (PR: 
https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1708<https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1634/files>)

  *   Add test cases for different input options (Sequential/Parallel filters, 
repeated, null_mode)
  *   Add parallel implementations for all options excluding Sequential filters 
(inherently not possible to do parallelization

2) What do I plan on doing next week?
Upon discussion with the mentors, we decided to change the current 
implementation for r.neighbor that currently uses Segment libraries that uses a 
temporary file buffer for the different threads to work on before producing the 
raster file format. We realized that the Segment library does not fit the use 
cases enough to compensate for the overhead it might add. It was essentially 
used as an API to write to the file buffer, and we are not making good use of 
its caching capabilities. A native temporary file buffer should fit our use 
cases the most where the threads can write output simultaneously (which is the 
current implementation for r.mfilter).

Next week, I aimed to make the necessary changes for r.neighbor and do proper 
benchmarking on large raster files to monitor the performance gain from 
parallelization (r.mfilter).


3) Am I blocked on anything?

No, it has been good so far.


Github repo: https://github.com/aaronsms/grass


Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks!


Warmest regards,

Aaron

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to