Hello,

This is an interesting discussion. I myself am in favor of having separate
entries for sources that have different editorial conventions.

I understand that some people are working on producing new books in the
tradition of the *Liber Usualis* but in different languages (I think there
was talk about this on the list some time ago); someone working on such a
project may be concerned to follow the *Liber Usualis* conventions
throughout the work, whereas another may want to be able to consistently
use the scheme of the *Graduale Romanum.* The question then doesn't only
concern booklets, but also the potential for working on larger projects. I
think that having multiple versions for each chant following the major
recent printed sources (e.g. Graduale Romanum 1961, Graduale Romanum 1974,
Liber Usualis) would facilitate a wider variety of future uses than having
a single version in GregoBase edited according to particular principles.

I also would emphasize the point made by Jacques Peron that having a
standardized editorial scheme in fact makes the process of proofreading *more
*difficult, because the task of proofreading/editing will go beyond a
simple comparison on the image of the printed score and the version
produced by Gregorio/Gregobase.

If it is decided to go with multiple versions, I would recommend that an
extra point of data be added for each chant that would have a sort of
standardized reference system for showing that it is linked with other
chants in GregoBase. One already existing database that this could follow
is the CANTUS Index (http://cantusindex.org/), which is a recently started
database which synthesizes the data of the CANTUS office chants database (
http://www.cantusdatabase.org/) with the Graduale Full-Text Database (
http://mass.cantusdatabase.org/). These tools are intended for
musicological research more than practical chant production, but I think
that they might serve well for helping this project to keep track of
individual chants that are being transcribed in multiple versions.

Yours,

br. Innocent Smith, op
_______________________________________________
Gregorio-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users

Reply via email to