On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 13:54 Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> wrote:
> Hello Job, > > You'll >> notice from the draft that once the limit is reached a CEASE >> Notification is sent; so I am not sure if the priority truly matters in >> context of tearing down the session. >> > > And I am not sure if CEASE matters in the context of BGP Persistence > efforts :) > Good feedback. I’ll have to rely on the GROW and IDR WGs to help understand how we view CEASE in this context and what must be done. > If you have specific suggestions what text and considerations should be >> added to the draft I would welcome that. >> > > I would suggest to just add a sentence that the actual number of prefixes > sent > without warning or error (session drop) should be a smallest number of > prefixes > either which were locally configured or pushed from the peer. > If closer to the time of publication of this draft there is another standard that may impact decisions here, yes that would be prudent to consider. Kind regards, Job >
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
