This sort of thing makes me uncomfortable.

What wouldn't make me uncomfortable is if we had a way to just kill
notifying if a user uninstalled before, and our pkg installer wasn't
the thing that reinstalled Growl. But I don't know of a good way to do
that without other problems we've discussed previously on the list.

Chris



On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Tarun Nagpal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> To get back to the issue: Would it be reasonable to block apps that
> install Growl surreptitiously? There wouldn't be much of a point of
> Dropbox installing growl if Growl no longer accepted Dropbox
> notifications. Obviously they haven't responded to a serious issue and
> it seems that this sort of punishment would get their attention. Yes
> it would hurt users, but the long term benefits should be there as
> they clean up their act.
>
> On Oct 19, 10:03 am, Christopher Forsythe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> My apologies for Nicholas taking up a large portion of time and
>> distracting everyone. He is now banned, as stated in the last email if
>> he continued on this thread.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Nicholas Sanders <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Chris
>> > While I don't entirely agree with you, I have tried to understand what you
>> > are saying from your perspective - an impossible but worthwhile aspiration
>> > in any circumstances. It is always interesting (if often painful) to learn
>> > how others see one, and you clearly have a long memory for my defects.
>> > But if I try to see the world from your side, I think it only fair that you
>> > try to see it from mine. For one thing, it is crystal clear that you have 
>> > no
>> > inkling at all as to why a mere subscriber might take offence at attacks on
>> > the authors of the software, or that the use of certain terms might pain a
>> > reader, whoever they are used by and at whom directed. Where I see a world 
>> > I
>> > only inhabit, you apparently see one which you want to control - no room
>> > there for diversity of comprehension, sadly.
>> > Whatever of that, I have at no time attempted to defend, excuse or justify
>> > my mistake - I have freely admitted it, and apologised for it. What is
>> > causing me the problem here is that I feel that I am being insulted and
>> > bullied, and I don't like it. The validity of your case (which I in no way
>> > dispute) is maligned by your rudeness and your threats, when the most I
>> > needed from you was your gentle reminder that my sarcastic one liners do 
>> > not
>> > in fact help anybody's cause.
>> > I am at least two people - one of them wants simply to apologise and 
>> > promise
>> > to try never to do something of the kind again, while the other is 
>> > possessed
>> > by the need to assert that this is not because of being threatened. The
>> > anger which you hold makes resolution of this dichotomy impossible for me.
>> > You say that I have no right to be angry about the kind of post that
>> > initiated this thread, but I am not. I don't think you actually mean 
>> > "right"
>> > here but, in any case, it is not anger that I have felt or feel now. Rather
>> > is there here another human who has his own life experience (clearly very
>> > much longer than yours, as it happens), and for whom the issue is rather 
>> > one
>> > of hurt. And this human feels he has every "right" to be hurt - by the
>> > original poster, by your intemperate words, by your bullying behaviour.
>> > I have no clear idea as to why you think you will improve a situation by
>> > using threats and offensive language but doing so is your choice, just as 
>> > it
>> > is my choice to continue to discuss the matter in spite of my risking being
>> > banned by doing so. I don't want to be banned, but neither do I want you or
>> > anyone else to think that I accept your threats as a valid basis for my
>> > behaviour choices.
>> > My closing position is that you are right that my action was childish (I
>> > believe I was the first to say so) and you are also right that I have erred
>> > in similar style in the past (which fact may indicate a personality defect
>> > similar to your own, although I believe we differ on which is actually
>> > poisonous). You are not right to bully or threaten me, not least because to
>> > do so is as ineffective and pointless as my childish remarks, and
>> > contradicts your own exhortation to be a nice person too.
>> > I have already apologised for causing the upset - I do so again now, 
>> > without
>> > reservation. I will not enter into any contract not to fail in the same
>> > manner again as long as my doing so is conditioned by fear of the result,
>> > nor is there any need for me to do so since I have at no time attempted to
>> > justify this kind of action anyway and wouldn't perform it if I thought
>> > first. Your threats are empty, not because you won't carry them out but
>> > because they cannot achieve your purpose.
>> > If I have anything further to add to the thread, I will do so direct to
>> > yourself - notwithstanding that you have warned me against doing that too.
>> > Anyhow, it's late for Eid and early for Thanksgiving - tomorrow is the
>> > Birthday of the Bab so I wish all readers the most sincere greetings for
>> > that.
>> > Nick out…
>>
>> > On 19 Oct 2010, at 00:30, Christopher Forsythe wrote:
>>
>> > Every time I started to type this email, I found myself not being able
>> > to complete it, so I stepped away. I think you aren't reading what I'm
>> > saying how I'm thinking it in my head, so I'm going to reiterate it in
>> > a different manner. After this, this thread needs to die. If you are
>> > confused, reread this. I will be as clear here as I am ever going to
>> > be.
>>
>> > When I thought about what kind of user you are to our community. I
>> > came to the conclusion that you are verging on being a poisonous
>> > person. Please see
>> >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645# if you
>> > have not seen it already, it's an excellent talk about the type of
>> > person I think you are verging on becoming.
>>
>> > The reason I say this is due to a pattern in responses which have no
>> > value, other than to be annoying. Here is a small list I found by just
>> > searching for about 3 minutes, I stopped looking once I hit 4 emails:
>>
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/msg/a19a2ff6a84ebdd8
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/msg/872c304048d33e0a
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/msg/74b285e15eb9ebf2
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/msg/be17f47730a0cc5f
>>
>> > Some common themes here are:
>>
>> > - Lack of useful responses
>> > - Sarcasm verging on starting a heated discussion on a thread
>> > - Short responses
>>
>> > This all said, you do provide some great feedback.When I found you
>> > provided the best feedback it was about your specific problems though.
>>
>> > You responded to this user first. The user does not have a way to
>> > differentiate who represents the project, and who is merely a member
>> > of this mailing list/discussion group. As such, you represented this
>> > entire group. You did so in a very sarcastic manner, with none of the
>> > following:
>>
>> > - No quality control.
>> > - No useful information to help the end user
>> > - No helping at all
>>
>> > All of this to what end? No good one as far as I'm concerned. So no, I
>> > do not believe you were wishing him a Merry Christmas. I know you were
>> > in fact being a prick. Which is why I'm angry at you. You basically
>> > just gave us a worse name to this user than we already had to him.
>> > Which isn't a good place for us to be in, seeing how this can all be
>> > avoided very easily.
>>
>> > Now, instead, you could have taken these actions, and not come across
>> > as someone who is simply out to make himself feel good for 2 seconds
>> > for a childish act:
>>
>> > - Responded with the link to the article about this issue
>> > - Responded saying you understand, and providing details about how
>> > dropbox is actually doing this, and then how to remove Growl
>> > - Not responded at all
>>
>> > These 3 responses at the very least would have been more beneficial
>> > than the response you chose to make.
>>
>> > Since you decided to send your sarcastic email to the list publicly, I
>> > decided to reprimand you publicly. I will reiterate what I said
>> > earlier. Do not respond to end users in this manner. They do not
>> > deserve to be treated like this. We don't either, but their anger is
>> > just, only not justly directed. You however have no right to be angry
>> > about it, since it is not affecting you at all.
>>
>> > I spent more time today thinking about this one thing than anything
>> > else. I have a six month old son who is better behaved than you are on
>> > this list. I'm not going to sit here and baby sit you, you need to be
>> > an adult here. I also want this thread to end, unless the original
>> > poster requires more assistance. However, since this thread was
>> > derailed, I've already started a direct email with him so he doesn't
>> > have to continue to deal with this.
>>
>> > I have concluded that this is not acceptable behavior to tolerate for
>> > these issues. If you respond to another user in a sarcastic manner
>> > such as this, I will ban you. If you continue to make me have to
>> > respond to you after being very clear in this email, I will also ban
>> > you. If you choose to email me or any other member of the Growl
>> > project directly to complain about this, I will ban you. Basically,
>> > drop the issue, move on, and don't be a prick in the future, and we're
>> > all set.
>>
>> > As far as I'm concerned, this should not have been how this user was
>> > handled. You made us look bad. You need to own up to that, and learn
>> > from it. I don't want to think about it anymore.
>>
>> > --
>>
>> > Nicholas J A Sanders
>> > ___________________
>> > semiotek
>>
>> > +44 [0]7092 153 409
>> > [email protected]
>> > ___________________
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> > "Growl Discuss" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Growl Discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Growl Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to