>jeu. 27 août 2026 at 08:23, Greg Hogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fellow Guix, > > After deep personal reflection I have accepted that my criticism of > GCD 007 during the discussion period does not satisfy the constructive > comments requirement for a vote of disapproval. Since this was the > only disapproval and more than 25% of the community deliberated, with > this annulment GCD 007 has been accepted. I don’t think that, upon rectification of one’s mind a few months after the deliberation period ends, we should be changing acceptance/rejection status of a GCD. Think the other way round: what if anyone decides to disapprove ? Do we have then to withdraw an accepted GCD since a few months ? What I several people do the same ? Do we accept / reject GCD dynamically with time ? Remember also that a GCD [0] can be proposed again if one considers that consensus may be reached on a second try, when people had the time to consider it more in depth. Maybe this is a way forward for GCD 007. C. [0] https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/raw/branch/main/001-gcd-process.md
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
