Hi, On Thu, 03 Sep 2026 12:29:05 +0200 Simon Tournier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Greg, what your message points seems about a misunderstanding of GCD > 001. Therefore, it’s what needs to be clarified, IMHO. Especially > what means “constructive comments”. Personally due to being way too tired I personally misunderstood GCD 001 because for me what is most important is practice, not necessarily what words are written in a document and I remembered the document wrongly. I remembered that consensus was required, but In real life, "consensus" can have multiple meanings, so I forgot that I really could veto the GCD. So what is the process to amend that GCD just to clarify some point and use stronger words like "I veto, instead of I disapprove" ? I guess I need a new GCD for that (like 00X-update-gcd-001.md) but my question is if 00X-update-gcd-001.md passes, beside adding this new .md file, do we then just modify the 001-gcd-process.md? Denis.
pgpXpwQpg9qCR.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
