Onno Meyer wrote: > > My main problems with GT:SM were: > > (1) It made a lot of references to Vehicles 1e, although VE 2e had been > > out for > > over a year. > > And it did not clarify which edition it quoted when.
Normally, the rule is to refer to the most recent edition. In this case, it was quickly lear that his was the case. > > (2) The battlesuit was ... well ... > > (3) The deckplans for the mercenary cruiser were unlabeled, making them > > useless. > > I've submitted a JTAS article to answer the first two problems. > Unfortunately it is way oversized - it is a replacement for two > chapters in the book, and some of the equipment chapter in the > GT core book as well. Several dozen vehicles, about a hundred > weapons, a narrative to explain WHY they were designed the way > they were designed and how it all comes together into military > forces designed to fight higher-TL, lower-TL or equal-TL enemies > and a couple of sample units. > > Maybe you can lobby The Powers That Be to make an exception :-) You sadly overestimate my influence. If anything, my very lobbying with TPTB would make is less, not more, likely that your article would be published. -- A generous and sadistic GM, Brandon Cope http://www.geocities.com/copeab "It has fallen upon me, now and again in my sojurns through the world, to ease various evil men of their lives. I have a feeling it will prove thus with the Baron." -- Solomon Kane ("The Castle of the Devil", Robert E. Howard) _______________________________________________ GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]> http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l
