I've spoken out on a freedom scientific list, actually on several of
them, and I've been very critical several times.  Let me tell you about
my experience with criticizing freedom scientific:

...

That's it, utter silence!  They don't listen on any of the lists, so
they don't care what you say.

Now, the list admins are way overly sensative in my opinion, and if you
say anything negative they're usually quite quick to threaten to ban you
from the list; they're very defensive when it comes to negative things
reported about jaws, especially comparisons with the competition.

One of the reasons I switched from jaws to window eyes however is that
they do listen on the list!  There are others, but I don't go around
saying window eyes is perfect, but I'm really greatful for people who
listen to your problems; and try to help where they can immediately, and
note them down for work when they can't.  I never knew if that was
happening with freedom scientific; well, I did, I've had some of my
reported bugs go on through multiple versions because they told me not
many people were using the software I was reporting a problem with.
They actually told me at one point it had been withdrawn from the
market, and of course it hadn't, but they were looking for any reason
not to list, and not to work on it.

If things aren't perfect now, well, I have a reasonable hope they will
be better soon, and I never had that with jaws.  I only had a reasonable
expectation that they would be charging for another upgrade soon,
regardless of how little it differed from the previous version.

Chip






------------------------------

Chip Orange
Database Administrator
Florida Public Service Commission

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(850) 413-6314

 (Any opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily reflect those of the Florida Public Service Commission.)
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 3:06 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Add remove script problem
> 
> It's not a question of being scared to speak out. some of us, no, 
> most of us try to take a constructive approach rather than lash out 
> blindly. Moreover, some of us are not having these issues of which 
> you complain.  Have you considered that possibility?
> I wonder if we would be so brave on a Freedom scientific list. The 
> lawyers would be coming down on you like a ton of bricks quicker than 
> you could say Jihad for Windows!
> Peace
> 
> 
> At 19:51 29/09/2008, you wrote:
> >         Pardon me, but I think people have a right to be concerned 
> > is scripts don't work.
> >
> >After all, that was the big push in the last development cycle, 
> >scripting pushed most other concerns to the back burner.
> >
> >So now if most of the company scripts are having problems, and 
> >people are concerned, well, they paid good money to be.
> >
> >Removeing the script will certianly fix the problem, but that's like 
> >removing your eye if you get something in it 'grin'.
> >
> >We're seeing a prime example of a little company who bit off more 
> >than they could chew and didn't give them selves enough time 
> to chew it.
> >
> >I've more or less come to grips with we, using it for the things it 
> >works well for.
> >
> >Web surfing, as long as you don't mind loosing your place a lot, but 
> >I'm used to we.
> >
> >it's good for exploring stuff, and mousing around.
> >
> >The scripts mostly work when they're not generating errors.
> >
> >I don't feel warm and fuzzy unless I have 5 or 6 errors a day but if 
> >the boys and girls are doing their job, this is helping them.
> >
> >I take great delight in making smart-ass comments when I 
> send in bug reports.
> >
> >But when we makes me mad, I have other alternatives.
> >
> >Some folks here don't and I'd be mad too if my main means of access 
> >wasn't doing what I needed.
> >
> >So trying to keep a balance between productively trying to squash 
> >bugs, and airing grievances, and being decent about it, and giving 
> >the guys a chance, all in all, I gotta to say, when someone's paid 
> >out good money, they expect results.
> >
> >I don't think they know entirely what they're doing yet, because 
> >scripting is so new for we, so we're having some growing pains.
> >
> >But it is frustrating as hell when your trying to get work done.
> >
> >God I do wish we didn't get rushed out the door so fast, you know a 
> >lot of people are afraid to speak up, but I've gotten some 
> >interesting private emails about this and that.
> >
> >I get in trouble for running my mouth, but better to die on your 
> >feet and live on your knees.
> >
> >So I tell all my students, and fellow we users, call them up, write 
> >them, let them know what you need and what ain't workin that's the 
> >only way things will ever change.
> >
> >If a blind man never stood up and fought for what they needed, we'd 
> >still be out in the street selling pencils and begging for aums.
> >
> >Some of us still aren't that much further along.
> >
> >But as long as we are paying gwmicro salaries, we have a right to 
> >ask, and to question, and yes, indeed to respectfully complain when 
> >it is called for.
> >
> >Thank you, and soap box session over.
> >
> >
> >At 12:09 PM 9/29/2008, you wrote:
> >>Why don't you just remove the script instead of engaging in 
> endless debate?
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Robert
> >>
> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "wayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: "Sam bushman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Cc: <[email protected]>
> >>Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 5:26 PM
> >>Subject: Re: Add remove script problem
> >>
> >>
> >>>his add remove is junk.
> >>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam bushman" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Cc: <[email protected]>
> >>>Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 10:01 AM
> >>>Subject: Re: Add remove script problem
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>        You say:
> >>>>The Add/Remove script was really just a proof of concept, 
> so there may
> >>>>
> >>>>Was this mentioned any where before people started using it?
> >>>>What other scripts are not for real?
> >>>>Thanks
> >>>>Sam
> >>>>
> >>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Smith" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 8:57 AM
> >>>>Subject: Re: Add remove script problem
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>The Add/Remove script was really just a proof of concept, so 
> >>>>>there may be issues. All it does is read in the uninstall keys 
> >>>>>in the registry, and then populates a list box with the results. 
> >>>>>There are no uninstall checks or anything like that to verify 
> >>>>>that an application can be uninstalled. It just calls the string 
> >>>>>in the uninstall key to begin the installation. As this is a GW 
> >>>>>Micro script, it is free to modify and re-distribute, so if 
> >>>>>someone wants to beef it up, they're welcome to it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Aaron
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Wendy Alling wrote:
> >>>>>>Hello to the list,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I have the add remove script installed and when I activate the 
> >>>>>>script with alt control a the list box comes up fine.  The 
> >>>>>>problem comes in when I try to remove a program.  I get error 
> >>>>>>messages that the program cannot be removed or that windows 
> >>>>>>can't find the file.  Is this supposed to work when you use 
> >>>>>>this script?  When I go to add remove programs in control panel 
> >>>>>>it works just fine.  If this is an issue with the script I hope 
> >>>>>>it can be resolved as it is an easy way to remove programs.
> >>>>>>Wendy
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>To insure that you receive proper support, please 
> include all past
> >>>>>correspondence (where applicable), and any relevant information
> >>>>>pertinent to your situation when submitting a problem 
> report to the GW
> >>>>>Micro Technical Support Team.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Aaron Smith
> >>>>>GW Micro
> >>>>>Phone: 260/489-3671
> >>>>>Fax: 260/489-2608
> >>>>>WWW: http://www.gwmicro.com
> >>>>>FTP: ftp://ftp.gwmicro.com
> >>>>>Technical Support & Web Development
> >>>>
> >>>>If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
> >>>>sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
> >>>>your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
> >>>>your message to [email protected] so the entire list 
> will receive it.
> >>>>
> >>>>All GW-Info messages are archived at 
> >>>>http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and 
> >>>>sorted using the search
> >>>>form at the bottom of the page.
> >>>>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
> >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the 
> body of the message.
> >>>
> >>>If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
> >>>sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
> >>>your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
> >>>your message to [email protected] so the entire list 
> will receive it.
> >>>
> >>>All GW-Info messages are archived at 
> >>>http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and 
> >>>sorted using the search
> >>>form at the bottom of the page.
> >>>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
> of the message.
> >>
> >>If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
> >>sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
> >>your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
> >>your message to [email protected] so the entire list will 
> receive it.
> >>
> >>All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, 
> >>and can be searched through and sorted using the search
> >>form at the bottom of the page.
> >>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
> of the message.
> >
> >
> >
> >For backing tracks, audio restoration, jingles and audio adds, 
> >low-priced tutoring and much more go to
> >www.affordablestudioservices.com
> >
> >If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
> >sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
> >your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
> >your message to [email protected] so the entire list will 
> receive it.
> >
> >All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, 
> >and can be searched through and sorted using the search
> >form at the bottom of the page.
> >If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
> of the message.
> 
> If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
> sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
> your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
> your message to [email protected] so the entire list will 
> receive it.
> 
> All GW-Info messages are archived at 
> http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through 
> and sorted using the search
> form at the bottom of the page. 
> 
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
> of the message.
> 
> 

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be 
searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body
of the message.

Reply via email to