2008/12/5 Ali B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Matthias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I don't want to risk tainting the AL2 code with GPL fragments, and I >> think that risk increases the closer together we bring differently >> licensed source code. There might also be license technicalities like "I >> can checkout the whole -extras repo, so you distribute code under the >> GPL, so it all has to be GPL". I believe our repositories should house >> only Apache 2.0 licensed code. >> > > After a brief discussion with Michael and Sean about this in IRC, and > reading the Matt's above quoted note, which I very much agree with and even > foresee if we allow conflicting licenses in -extras, I am changing my vote > to +1 for allowing only ASL-compatible code in -extras.
Which would make it a -1 in the context of this vote :) -- Michael C. Harris, School of CS&IT, RMIT University http://twofishcreative.com/michael/blog IRC: michaeltwofish #habari --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to habari-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
