Yeah well, numbers are too confusing for me :) On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Michael Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > 2008/12/5 Ali B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Matthias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > >> I don't want to risk tainting the AL2 code with GPL fragments, and I > >> think that risk increases the closer together we bring differently > >> licensed source code. There might also be license technicalities like "I > >> can checkout the whole -extras repo, so you distribute code under the > >> GPL, so it all has to be GPL". I believe our repositories should house > >> only Apache 2.0 licensed code. > >> > > > > After a brief discussion with Michael and Sean about this in IRC, and > > reading the Matt's above quoted note, which I very much agree with and > even > > foresee if we allow conflicting licenses in -extras, I am changing my > vote > > to +1 for allowing only ASL-compatible code in -extras. > > Which would make it a -1 in the context of this vote :) > > -- > Michael C. Harris, School of CS&IT, RMIT University > http://twofishcreative.com/michael/blog > IRC: michaeltwofish #habari > > > > -- Ali B / dmondark http://www.awhitebox.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
