> I would still like to hear what Rasmus has to say, if he responds. However, unless that reveals some sort of unexpected evidence to the contrary, I think that allowing GPL code on hp.o is dangerous at best. None of us want a run-in with the FSF, and the risks simply aren't worth the "reward" of allowing a broader licensing regime on hp.o.
So, my vote for now is -1 (== no GPL code on hp.o) I do think we should expedite some sort of automated plugin system in light of this discussion, though... S --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
