On 02/28/22 09:27PM, Dave Blanchard wrote: > On that note, regrettably it will be necessary for me to fork this project, > if for no other reason than to properly comment it, so that its functionality > can be understood and easily modified. It's a shame that such a nice little > program is marred by its total lack of commentation, along with poorly chosen > function and variable names. The use of tabs in the source code isn't > particularly desirable either, IMO.
There's probably a good argument to be made in favor of some other formatting style; you just need to make it. I felt similar regarding the commentation at first, but then I read through DVTM & found that what st was doing was self evident. > Overall, I like the 'suckless' initiative. I'm sick of all the bloat in the > Linux world. My distro is built to be light weight, simple, and fast. 'st' is > proving to be a nice addition, and a good starting point for building > something even better. Looking forward to integrating more of your code into > my system as I spend more time exploring your different projects, and the > useful patches you've provided. Thanks for your work. > If you really wanted to dab on st, you could have just - removed the `-l` argument - simplified ttywriteraw - suggested that st shouldn't be scheduling for modem lines - offer minicom as an alternative for those lead astray But clearly you're too retarded to make a decent critisism like that. ;) Jeremy
