On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 07:49:21AM -0800, Jeremy wrote: > On 02/28/22 09:27PM, Dave Blanchard wrote: > > On that note, regrettably it will be necessary for me to fork this project, > > if for no other reason than to properly comment it, so that its > > functionality can be understood and easily modified. It's a shame that such > > a nice little program is marred by its total lack of commentation, along > > with poorly chosen function and variable names. The use of tabs in the > > source code isn't particularly desirable either, IMO. > > There's probably a good argument to be made in favor of some other > formatting style; you just need to make it. > > I felt similar regarding the commentation at first, but then I read > through DVTM & found that what st was doing was self evident. > > > Overall, I like the 'suckless' initiative. I'm sick of all the bloat in the > > Linux world. My distro is built to be light weight, simple, and fast. 'st' > > is proving to be a nice addition, and a good starting point for building > > something even better. Looking forward to integrating more of your code > > into my system as I spend more time exploring your different projects, and > > the useful patches you've provided. Thanks for your work. > > > > If you really wanted to dab on st, you could have just > - removed the `-l` argument > - simplified ttywriteraw > - suggested that st shouldn't be scheduling for modem lines > - offer minicom as an alternative for those lead astray > > But clearly you're too retarded to make a decent critisism like that. ;) >
Please don't use language like this here. > Jeremy > -- Kind regards, Hiltjo
