Hello,
>
> Unfortunately I the "show errors" returned empty, so I guess it
> was something else. The good news is that I gave haproxy 1.4.2 a
> try today and the 502/PR error with PUT/TE:chunked requests have
> now vanished. So thanks for solving this. I'm not sure which one of
> the bugs I was hitting but it does not really matter since it now
> seems to be fixed.
>
> So now when I got a working haproxy 1.4, I continued to try out
> the "option http-server-close" but I hit a problem with our
> stunnel (patched with stunnel-4.22-xforwarded-for.diff) instances.
> It does not support keep-alive, so only the first HTTP request in
> a keepalive-session gets the X-Forwarded-For header added (insert
> Homer "doh!" here :). When giving it some thought, I guess this is
> the expected behaviour for what stunnel actually is supposed to do.
> So, for now I'll stick with "option httpclose" for a while
> longer...
>
> Keep up the good work!
>
> Best regards Erik
>

Maybe it's worth a try for you to get along with nginx as stunnel
replacement ?
Its performance is quit good and the config can be held very short,
too for only accepting ssl traffic
and directing it to haproxy.

kind regards,
Malte


Reply via email to