The problem with nginx is that it doesnt support chunked-encoding. Since that is what we are after, we can't use nginx until it supports it or until we can get rid of chunked encoding. So posting about how good it is working for you is not really helping our issue. Thanks though.
BR, Timh 2010/3/19 duncan hall <dun...@viator.com> > Throw me in a forth on this one. I use nginx 0.8.34 for gzip compression, > RAM caching of static content and SSL offload. All very simple to configure > and low overheads. All requests HTTP and HTTPs go to Nginx and are then > forwarded to HAproxy 1.4.2 as HTTP. > Regards, > > Duncan > > > > Harvey Yau wrote: > >> I can third this - nginx + haproxy works extremely well. I wish haproxy >> supported SSL directly. I realize it's not within the design goals of >> haproxy, but the need for this is out there. Good thing nginx + haproxy >> works well enough. >> >> -- Harvey >> >> On 3/18/10 3:29 PM, Nicholas Hadaway wrote: >> >>> I can second this comment and say that it works extremely well... nginx >>> operates very nicely as an SSL offloading device. >>> >>> I am right now using nginx 0.8.33 (soon to bump up to 0.8.34) and HAProxy >>> 1.4.2 in production and things work very well for me. >>> >>> -Nick >>> >>> >>>> Maybe it's worth a try for you to get along with nginx as stunnel >>>> replacement ? >>>> Its performance is quit good and the config can be held very short, >>>> too for only accepting ssl traffic >>>> and directing it to haproxy. >>>> >>>> kind regards, >>>> Malte >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Timh Bergström System Operations Manager Diino AB - www.diino.com :wq
